Fauxios Logo Fauxios
When 'Useful Arts' Become Crown Prerogative: Senator McCormick's AI Stance Echoes Pre-Revolutionary Economic Control

Senator David McCormick (R-Pa.) is positioning himself as a leading voice on artificial intelligence, a technology he describes as the most profound change of our time, yet his approach raises familiar questions about power and privilege.

Apr 16, 2026 - Technology

When 'Useful Arts' Become Crown Prerogative: Senator McCormick's AI Stance Echoes Pre-Revolutionary Economic Control

Author By Vivian Holloway

Senator David McCormick (R-Pa.) is positioning himself as a leading voice on artificial intelligence, a technology he describes as the most profound change of our time, yet his approach raises familiar questions about power and privilege.

Why it matters: The foundational premise for fostering innovation, enshrined in the power "to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing, for a limited time, to authors and inventors, the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries," was for broad public benefit. When legislative figures, tasked with public service, champion unchecked innovation while their personal interests align directly with the industries they promote, the distinction between public good and private prerogative erodes. This dynamic, where the power to shape emergent economic realities resides with the directly invested, is chillingly reminiscent of colonial frustration with royal charters and monopolies benefiting favored British merchants. The Senator's assertion that regulation is 'too soon' for a technology he acknowledges carries profound risks, while simultaneously securing vast public investments for it, evokes a familiar grievance. The American Revolution was, in part, a fight against economic control exerted by powerful, distant interests operating under a façade of benevolent oversight. This modern scenario raises similar questions about self-governance and the right of the populace to oversee its own economic destiny, rather than simply bear the 'trickle down' costs of an unregulated frontier.

Read the Full Story

Other Latest Stories

More Articles

The King's Midnight: Trump's Hormuz Ultimatum and the Ghost of '76

As President Donald Trump issued a midnight deadline to Tehran over the Strait of Hormuz, threatening an entire civilization, the dramatic pronouncements reverberated with a familiar historical cadence, reminiscent of imperial fiats from another age.

As President Donald Trump issued a midnight deadline to Tehran over the Strait of Hormuz, threatening an entire civilization, the dramatic pronouncements reverberated with a familiar historical cadence, reminiscent of imperial fiats from another age.

Why it matters: The President's current posture regarding the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery of global commerce, resurrects a foundational grievance that once ignited a revolution: the arbitrary control over trade. The threat to extinguish an entire civilization, ostensibly to secure a passage, directly parallels the Crown's imperial assertion of dominion over colonial economic lifelines. As the Virginia Declaration of Rights so succinctly articulated a similar affront, lamenting "For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world," so too does this modern ultimatum challenge the very notion of sovereign economic self-determination.

Read the Full Story
Treaty by Proclamation: The Crown's Latest Nuclear Endeavor

In a diplomatic maneuver raising questions about executive authority, the United States and Russia have agreed to informally observe the expired New START nuclear arms treaty.

In a diplomatic maneuver raising questions about executive authority, the United States and Russia have agreed to informally observe the expired New START nuclear arms treaty.

Why it matters: This informal accord, bypassing constitutional Senate consent, echoes a foundational grievance: policies lacking explicit assent. Such executive actions blur lines between law and dominion by fiat. As Dickinson noted, "The various Non-Importation Agreements... bear testimony to the popularity of the proposed plan," a testimony absent from this nuclear "observation."

Read the Full Story
The Crown's Latest Edict on Armaments: An Unrepresented Gambit in the Nuclear Commons

As the New START treaty officially concludes its tenure tomorrow, the global community is left to reckon with a strategic vacuum, a stark reminder of power exercised without the customary checks of collective deliberation.

As the New START treaty officially concludes its tenure tomorrow, the global community is left to reckon with a strategic vacuum, a stark reminder of power exercised without the customary checks of collective deliberation.

Why it matters: The immediate implication of New START's expiration is a return to an environment of strategic opacity, where the foundational concept of 'mutual predictability' — a cornerstone of rational statecraft — is discarded. This unilateral reordering of global security, pursued without meaningful international consensus or even domestic legislative urgency, evokes the very grievances that ignited revolution. As Thomas Paine starkly warned of the consequences when fundamental compacts are dissolved: "But admitting that matters were now made up, what would be the event? I answer, the ruin of the continent. And that for several reasons."

Read the Full Story
The Digital Writs of Assistance: Children's Data Breach Unearths a Founding Grievance

A recent Senate inquiry into an AI toy company, accused of exposing tens of thousands of children's private conversations, resurrects a fundamental American demand for the sanctity of the domestic sphere against intrusive powers.

A recent Senate inquiry into an AI toy company, accused of exposing tens of thousands of children's private conversations, resurrects a fundamental American demand for the sanctity of the domestic sphere against intrusive powers.

Why it matters: The contemporary struggle for children's digital privacy directly echoes a foundational American grievance: the right to be secure in one's home. Unconsented data collection and exposure by powerful entities, even private corporations, are a digital analogue to the arbitrary intrusions that fueled colonial resistance. Personal sovereignty hinges on control over one's domain against unaccountable powers. This is not just a regulatory issue; it's an enduring fight for core liberties.

Read the Full Story
The Unsettling Melody of Sedition: 2026's Anthems Recall Colonial Grievances

Across the republic, from digital screens to crowded thoroughfares, a discordant symphony of dissent is rising, challenging established authority with a familiar fervor that echoes through the annals of history.

Across the republic, from digital screens to crowded thoroughfares, a discordant symphony of dissent is rising, challenging established authority with a familiar fervor that echoes through the annals of history.

Why it matters: The contemporary surge in protest music is more than just a passing cultural trend; it is a profound historical echo, resonating with the very grievances that precipitated the American Revolution. The widespread adoption of anthems, much like how "The Liberty Song" was "heard resounding in almost all Companies in Town, and by way of eminence called "The Liberty Song," _you are desired to republish in your_ 'circulating' Paper for the Benefit of the whole Continent of America," signals a collective articulation of dissent against perceived infringements on liberty and self-governance.

Read the Full Story